Home |  Contact Us |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map

Member Login 

  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Business
    • Corporate Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Shareholders
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Member Search
    • Payment Options
  • separatror.png Information for Homeowners
    • Information for Homeowners
    • My Mortgage Info
    • FAQ
    • Links
  • separatror.png Neighborhood Benefits
  • separatror.png Join MERS®
    • Join MERS®
    • Sales Contacts
    • MERS® Residential
    • MERS® Servicer ID
    • MERS® Commercial
    • MERS® eRegistry
    • MERS® Link
    • Fee Schedule
    • FAQ
  • separatror.png Media Room
    • Media Room
    • Media Contacts
    • Press Releases
      • Archives 2012
      • Archives 2011
      • Archives 2010
    • Press Kit
    • In the News

  • Home
    • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. April 2013 News Summary
    • MERS Wins Dismissal of Recorder Fee Suit
    • Idaho Supreme Court: MERS Meets Definition of Beneficiary
    • Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Kentucky Recording Fee Suit
    • New York State Supreme Court Rejects Mortgage/Note “Splitting” Claim
    • MERS Wins Dismissal of Recording Fee Suit in Union County Illinois
    • MERS Statement on Kentucky AG Complaint
    • Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Affirms MERS’ Role
    • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. December 2012 News Summary
    • Federal Judge, Citing Bain Decision, Rejects Plaintiffs’ Consumer Protection Act Claims
    • Sanctions Awarded Against Minnesota Foreclosure Defense Attorney Now Total Over $263,000
    • MERS Prevails Against Recording Fee Claim
    • Texas Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Challenge to MERS’ Role
    • MERS’ Role as Beneficiary Consistently Upheld by Federal Courts in Idaho
    • Kansas Court of Appeals Validates MERS’ Model, Rejects “Note Splitting” Theory
    • Washington Court of Appeals affirms Dismissal of Consumer Claims Against MERS
    • Oregon Federal Courts Continue to Affirm MERS’ Role as Beneficiary
    • Kansas Court of Appeals Validates MERS’ Role as Agent
    • MERSCORP Holdings Launches Monthly Corporate Developments Release
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Member Login Link opens new window

  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Our Business
    • Corporate Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Shareholders
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Member Search
    • Payment Options
  • Information for Homeowners
    • Information for Homeowners
    • My Mortgage Info
    • FAQ
    • Links
  • Neighborhood Benefits
  • Join MERS®
    • Join MERS®
    • Sales Contacts
    • MERS® Residential
    • MERS® Servicer ID
    • MERS® Commercial
    • MERS® eRegistry
    • MERS® Link
    • Fee Schedule
    • FAQ
  • Media Room
    • Media Room
    • Media Contacts
    • Press Releases
      • Archives 2012
      • Archives 2011
      • Archives 2010
      • Washington Federal Court Ruling Favors MERS
      • New Hampshire Superior Court Rules in MERS’ Favor
      • Alabama Supreme Court Upholds Lower Court’s Recognition of MERS’ Authority to Assign Mortgages
      • MERS Wins Important Property Tax Foreclosure Case in Arizona
      • MERS Prevails in Michigan Federal Court Transfer Tax Suit
      • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. April 2013 News Summary
      • MERS Wins Dismissal of Recorder Fee Suit
      • Idaho Supreme Court: MERS Meets Definition of Beneficiary
      • MERS Wins Federal Lawsuit in the Sixth Circuit
      • Georgia Court of Appeals Validates MERS’ Role and Authority
      • WA Superior Court Recognizes MERS as Agent of Beneficiary
      • Michigan Appeals Court Finds MERS Role Valid
      • MERS’ Role in Rhode Island Affirmed by State Supreme Court
      • MERS Prevails Again in the Eighth Circuit
      • RI Superior Court: Plaintiff’s Arguments vs. MERS Consistently Rejected
      • Montana Court: “Law Permits MERS to Act as Nominee for the Lender”
      • “Split the Note” Theory Rejected in Oregon
      • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. March 2013 News Summary
      • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. February 2013 News Summary
      • MERS Prevails Again over “Split the Note” Claim
      • Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Adds its Voice in Affirming MERS’ Authority
      • Florida Court Ruling Affirms MERS’ Role as Mortgagee
      • Federal Court in Washington Sides with MERS
      • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms MERS' Authority
      • First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules MERS “Faithful” to “Mortgage Law”
      • Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Kentucky Recording Fee Suit
      • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. Statement on Recorder Fee Suit in Minnesota
      • New York State Supreme Court Rejects Mortgage/Note “Splitting” Claim
      • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. January 2013 News Summary
      • MERS Wins Dismissal of Recording Fee Suit in Union County Illinois
      • MERS Prevails in Two Federal Appeals Cases
      • MERS Statement on Kentucky AG Complaint
      • MERS Wins Dismissal of Missouri Recording Fee Suit
      • Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Affirms MERS’ Role
      • MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. December 2012 News Summary
    • Press Kit
    • In the News
 
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Member Login

 

Copyright© 2013 by MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. 1-800-646-MERS (6377)
Other products or company names are or may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are the property of their respective holders.

Designed by RocketTheme
Back to Top